A visitable tunnel (gallery with sufficient section for personnel access) is usually recommended when the project prioritizes operation and maintenance (OPEX) y accessibility for decades. A non-accessible driving (a “closed” pipe, typically installed by pipe ramming) is usually preferable when premium minimize CAPEX, The maintenance can be solved from registers/chambers without entering the interior.
A visitable tunnel is more advisable when:
Frequent or critical maintenance: recurrent inspections, repairs or replacements are foreseen, or there is a high criticality of the service (very costly shutdowns).
You need real accessibility to elementsvalves, gates, bypasses, instrumentation or future tie-ins to be operated without trenching.
Multipurpose infrastructureyou want to host several pipelines/services (water, drainage, energy, telecom) in the same gallery to organize the subsoil.
Highly sensitive urban environmentThe social cost/permission to intervene on the surface in the future is high (traffic, impact on businesses, complex easements).
Durability and control requirementsYou are looking for a robust structural cladding and interior registration; it is usually associated with solutions of segment tunnel, with clear needs for vertical wells y civil work.
Non-accessible driving is more advisable when:
The objective is to transport flow with minimum auxiliary works., without the need for interior access: typical in networks of urban sewage systems, urban supply system o infrastructure crossings where it is critical to execute “trenchless” with precision.
The visitable section is not justified by OPEX: inspection and maintenance are solved by cleaning, CCTV/robots and spot cameras, without the need for continuous human access.
Space restrictions and permissionsbuilding a visitable tunnel implies larger shafts/portals, more implementation and more logistics (ventilation, safety in confined spaces, etc.).
Budget and timeframeA “non-accessible” conduit usually reduces total cost and complexity compared to a visitable gallery.
In practice, the decision is taken as a trade-off CAPEX vs OPEX (and risk): if the cost of surface intervention in the future is high or the asset is very critical, the visitable tunnel usually wins; if the priority is to execute quickly and with less ancillary work, the installed pipeline usually wins with pipe ramming. To ground it with your data (layout, geology, operation, criticality and permits), the most efficient way is to evaluate it from the following points Technical assistance and engineering.
ES 
EN 
FR 